Skip to main content

For Prime Contractors and Public-Sector Digital Agencies

Accessibility subcontracting for government delivery teams

Add a defined Section 508 or WCAG workstream to a proposal, delivery milestone, or document-remediation backlog without staffing an entire accessibility department. 508 Audit supports testing, document accessibility, remediation QA, and evidence-based review against the requirements agreed for each engagement.

What a prime receives

Deliverables and scope.

  • An explicit workstream boundary for the engagement
  • The agreed method and the applicable standard
  • Structured findings with locations, observed impact, and remediation guidance
  • Quality review and acceptance evidence when included in scope
  • Clear disclosure of limitations, excluded content, and unresolved findings

Built for

Built for these buyers.

  • Primes adding a Section 508 or WCAG workstream to a proposal
  • Delivery teams with a document-remediation backlog
  • Public-sector digital agencies delivering to state, local, and federal buyers
  • Teams needing review of accessibility output produced by another vendor

How we work with delivery teams

Scoped subcontract role

A defined work package with named responsibilities, rather than a companywide program. Subcontract terms are discussed after reviewing the applicable solicitation and flow-downs.

Documented methodology

Manual evaluation using the DHS Trusted Tester methodology, with automated tooling used where appropriate and human judgment defining acceptance.

Honest independence language

We disclose whether we produced the work. Independence is claimed only when the output was produced by another party.

Accessibility help at the point your team needs it

Your team may need a precise piece of work, not another large consulting engagement. We can scope a representative document diagnostic, a targeted accessibility test, remediation QA, or review of third-party output, with documented findings and a clear boundary around what was and was not assessed.

  • Document Accessibility Diagnostic

    Review a defined sample of PDFs or source documents, and deliver a baseline, observed barriers, a prioritized finding log, and remediation effort estimates. A sample is not a complete library audit.

  • Accessibility Testing and Evidence

    Test agreed pages, templates, workflows, or documents against the applicable Section 508 and WCAG requirements, and deliver issue evidence with actionable remediation guidance.

  • Remediation QA and Retesting

    Review a specified batch or set of fixes, document remaining issues, and verify the defined closure criteria.

  • Third-Party Output Validation

    Independently validate accessibility output produced by another vendor or platform when independence is appropriate. When 508 Audit performs the remediation itself, we describe subsequent review as QA or validation.

  • VPAT and ACR Support

    Scoped evidence review, preparation support, or buyer-side assessment as appropriate. No ACR is included in a small diagnostic unless separately contracted.

We offer two distinct things, and we keep them labelled. First, remediation production with our own quality assurance applied to it. Second, independent evaluation of output produced by a third party. Review of work we produced ourselves is quality assurance, and we do not describe it as independent.

Standalone website audit

Independent Website Accessibility Audits Before Launch

For government contractors and public-sector web teams preparing a completed website for acceptance and production. We scope the WCAG 2.2 Level AA evaluation to the agreed website, workflows, components, and release requirements.

The audit does not guarantee complete conformance or buyer acceptance. A website audit is distinct from reviewing an existing platform or vendor ACR, and from authoring a new ACR; either ACR service is included only when contracted.

  • Automated and expert manual review
  • Keyboard testing, plus screen-reader and responsive/mobile review where in scope
  • Forms, navigation, and interactive-component evaluation
  • Evidence-backed written findings and practical remediation recommendations
  • One defined retest and a final validation summary only when contracted
  • Review of an existing platform or vendor ACR only when contracted

Ways to start

Three defined entry points for delivery teams

Each engagement is written as a bounded work package. The exact scope, applicable standards, deliverables, schedule, and fee are established before quoting.

  • Accessibility Acceptance Sprint

    For prime contractors and digital agencies approaching a defined accessibility delivery milestone.

    Possible scope

    • Representative document or application testing
    • Verification of specified remediation findings
    • Accessibility issue documentation and supporting evidence
    • Defined retesting when included in the statement of work
    • Findings and disposition summary
  • Embedded Accessibility QA

    For delivery teams with continuing accessibility work.

    Possible scope

    • Defined monthly testing capacity
    • Issue tracking and triage
    • Remediation verification
    • Document accessibility review
    • Exception reporting and monthly delivery summaries
  • Automation Assurance Benchmark

    For organizations evaluating automated or AI-assisted document remediation.

    Possible scope

    • Representative document sampling
    • Testing of third-party automation output
    • Identification of unresolved and introduced defects
    • Assessment of reading order, document structure, tables, forms, and alternative text as applicable
    • Estimated remaining specialist effort, with suitability and workflow recommendations

Start with a paid, bounded pilot

If your prime delivery team has a document sample or a specific milestone, we can define the assets, applicable standards, testing methods, named responsibilities, deliverables, schedule, and fixed fee in a short SOW. The pilot gives you a tangible assessment and a realistic basis for any larger work package. Pricing depends on actual scope and complexity.

  1. Step 1

    Share the requirement and a permitted sample through an approved secure method.

  2. Step 2

    Agree on the sample, acceptance criteria, responsibilities, delivery date, and price.

  3. Step 3

    Receive the diagnostic or QA evidence defined in the SOW.

  4. Step 4

    Review findings and decide whether to authorize a separate remediation or follow-up phase.

How engagements are scoped

Quoted from a short intake

Narrowly scoped pilots and small document engagements are quoted by scope. Larger audits, full ACR work, and multi-phase programs are separately priced.

Scope, applicable standards, deliverables, schedule, and fee are fixed in a short SOW before work begins.

Common questions

  • Can we bring 508 Audit in just for document QA or a limited release?
    Yes. We can scope a defined work package without requiring a companywide accessibility program.
  • Does a diagnostic certify our complete project as compliant?
    No. It assesses the agreed sample and reports observed findings. Full conformance claims need an appropriately scoped evaluation and supporting evidence.
  • Can you work under our prime contract?
    We can discuss a defined subcontract role after reviewing the applicable solicitation, flow-down terms, insurance, and delivery obligations.
  • Do you remediate and independently validate the same work?
    We call reviews of our own remediation QA or validation. We reserve independent validation for output produced by another party.

Have a document batch or accessibility milestone coming up?

Send the requirement and we will propose a contained work package.